|
Home
: Restore Parental Rights
THSC Announces Effort
to Restore
Parental Rights
Some years ago THSC was contacted by a home school mom in West
Texas who was desperate for help in fighting a lawsuit against her
family, which had been filed by her father. The following is her
story:
She was married to her second husband and had one child from the
previous marriage and two by her current husband. The family was
of humble means and had chosen to homeschool because they were
concerned about the negative influences of their children’s peers
in the public school. Her parents, however, did not agree with
this decision and, in fact, believed that the parents were being
“overprotective”; they were especially critical of decisions
related to the oldest child. During one time together with the
family, the grandfather physically attacked the husband in front
of the whole family. As a result, the parents sought and received
a restraining order to prohibit the grandfather from being with
the family.
The grandparents responded by filing suit under the Grandparent
Access Statute. The grandparents’ lawyer claimed that
it was in the best interest of the children to have visitation
with their grandfather. The children’s emotional well-being, he
argued, would be significantly impaired because they were being
homeschooled and did not have enough interaction with other
children. In spite of the history of assault upon the father, the
judged ordered visitation for both grandparents. The grandparents
continued the legal action against the parents for years, seeking
more and more control of the children. At one point, they told
the parents they would drop the lawsuit if they could have custody
of the oldest child while the parents maintained custody of the
younger two. After many years of litigation, the parents finally
yielded and allowed their oldest child to live with the
grandparents.
In a similar case, a family in Houston had homeschooled for many
years, against the strong dissent of the paternal grandparents.
The grandparents strongly disagreed with many of the views of the
parents, including religious beliefs and educational decisions of
the family, and the father told his parents at one point that if
they continued to interfere and cause discord, they would not be
allowed to visit the children. Then the father suddenly became
ill with cancer and died within six months.
The grandparents began their attack almost immediately after their
son’s death. A CPS (Child Protective Services) caseworker later
testified in court she was certain the grandparents had been
responsible for a phony tip that the mother had made a death pact
to kill herself and all her children so they could join the soul
of the deceased husband and father. The grandparents filed suit
for visitation, and the mother unwisely took her children and
moved out of the country, without notifying the authorities. The
grandparents then amended their suit from visitation to custody.
In the absence of the family, a judge gave a default judgment of
custody to the grandparents who then spent $200,000 to find the
family. Armed soldiers forcibly removed the children, allowing
the mother to accompany them, only to be arrested when she
reentered the country. The mother was indicted for interfering
with child custody and jailed with bonds set totaling three
million dollars. She spent several months in jail, until the bond
was lowered to $30,000. A court-appointed attorney for the minor
children said she had interviewed each child and was moved by how
close they were to their mother and by their desire to be with
her. The grandparents sought joint custody and wanted to make the
educational decisions for the children. After three and a half
years of litigation, the mother finally regained sole custody of
her children. Unfortunately, not all such cases have this
positive an ending.
These kinds of stories are not unusual. In fact, recently a
widow, whose husband was killed in the military overseas, was sued
by the paternal grandparents within two weeks of her husband’s
death. Hundreds of families have lived through such nightmares.
Others continue. The Texas Supreme Court has ruled in two such
cases—in 2006 and 2007—in the parents’ favor. In both cases,
after the Supreme Court’s ruling, the local judge allowed the
grandparents to simply file suit again. These and many other
parents face the stark choice of bankruptcy or yielding to the
unreasonable demands of grandparents regarding the upbringing and
education of their children.
In 1995 the Texas legislature amended the Family Code to allow
grandparents to sue parents, or others who had custody, for access
to their grandchildren. This type of legislation has been adopted
in virtually every state in the nation, driven by powerful senior
citizen groups. The purpose was to allow a means to have access
for grandparents who were being kept from their grandchildren.
This change has had unintended consequences that are destroying
Texas families and undermining the fundamental right of parents to
direct the education and upbringing of their children. The law
was amended again in 2005 to allow grandparents to sue for actual
possession, in addition to mere access. The statute sets a lower
standard of evidence required for access or possession than is
required under other parts of the Family Code for custody.
That must change. However, in the last
legislative session, THSC Association supported HB 3971 by Bryan
Hughes, which would have addressed many of these issues in the
current law. The bill did not pass.
How do we restore parental rights in this area and stop this
abuse? We must change the law!
The first step in changing this law is to make Texas
home schoolers and all parents aware of the problem and how and
why the law needs to be changed. THSC will support the Texas
Parental Rights Restoration Act (TPRRA) in the legislative
session next year. Please forward this information to others.
The TPRRA will be modeled on HB 3971 from last session. For more
information on this legislation and reasons that this law needs to
be amended, read the
talking
points and the
commentary.
The second step in changing the law is to speak now to your
legislators (state representatives and state senators), while most
of them are running campaigns for election or reelection. If they
have contested races in the primary or general election, they will
very likely be much more responsive to any questions or concerns
that you have. In fact, when I asked a legislator earlier this
week to co-sponsor the TPRRA, he told me that a home schooler had
spoken to him a week before on the issue and that he would be glad
to make that commitment. I also received a call from another
legislator whose home school constituents brought her a copy of
the February issue of the THSC Review magazine with an
article on the issue. They convinced her to support the
legislation. Those candidates whom THSC PAC has endorsed and who
have committed to co-sponsoring the TPRRA are noted on the
PAC Web site. If your legislators or candidates for state
House or Senate have not made that commitment, call them and ask
them to do so. The more calls they get on this, the more
seriously they will view the issue and the more likely they will
be to sign on as supporters.
The third step in fixing this problem is to elect
legislators sympathetic to our cause. When candidates see and
hear from many voters on this issue and have these same families
support their campaigns and help them get elected, they will more
likely be in favor of this issue before they even get to Austin.
The fourth step is to repeat this process during the
general election in November, to finish electing to the Texas
legislature candidates who believe that a parent’s right to direct
the education and upbringing of their children is fundamental and
must be protected.
Another step in this process will be participation in the
interim committee study of this issue, which has been established
for review in both the Texas House and Senate. We will make
parents aware of the hearings that are held and encourage people
who have suffered such problems to give testimony. These
committees will make a recommendation to the legislature next year
about changes to the law that should take place. If you are not
on the THSC PAC E-Newsletter list,
please register for free regular updates on this and other
issues of importance to the home school community of Texas.
Next year THSC Association will lead the fight to gain support for
the TPRRA at the legislature and in meetings and rallies across
the state. We will also sponsor a rally at the Capitol on this
issue to show grassroots support to restore parental rights.
Please pray for THSC Association and as we seek to use all the
means at our disposal to restore parental rights. Time is short
before the primary, but we have already seen significant movement
on the part of many legislators; you can help us turn the tide in
favor of parental rights with your participation and support.
With your help and God’s grace, we can restore parental rights in
Texas in the next two years!
In your service,
Tim Lambert
PS In addition to working on the TPRRA, we are also endorsing the
effort by ParentalRights.org to amend the U.S. Constitution with
language that would state unequivocally that a parent’s right to
direct the education and upbringing of his/her child is a
fundamental right under the Constitution. This group has a
five-year plan to amend the Constitution as a further protection
of parental rights. For more information on that effort, go to
Parental
Rights.org.
|