|
Home
: Restore Parental Rights
See the
TPRRA
Talking Points and
Commentary.
THSC Announces Effort
to Restore
Parental Rights
In 1995 the Texas
legislature amended the Family Code to allow grandparents to sue
parents, or others who had custody, for access to their
grandchildren. This type of legislation has been adopted in
virtually every state in the nation, driven by powerful senior
citizen groups. The purpose was to allow a means to have access
for grandparents who were being kept from their grandchildren.
This change has had unintended consequences that are destroying
Texas families and undermining the fundamental right of parents to
direct the education and upbringing of their children. The law was
amended again in 2005 to allow grandparents to sue for actual
possession, in addition to mere access. The statute sets a lower
standard of evidence required for access or possession than is
required under other parts of the Family Code for custody.
That must change. However, in the last
legislative session, THSC Association supported HB 3971 by Bryan
Hughes, which would have addressed many of these issues in the
current law. The bill did not pass.
Read about some
of the families negatively impacted by this law.
How do we restore
parental rights in this area and stop this abuse? We
must change the law!
The
first step
in standing up for families and changing this law is to make Texas
home schoolers and all parents aware of the problem. THSC
Association considers the Texas Parental Rights Restoration Act
(TPRRA) the solution and is calling for its support
through House Bill 2084. Please spread this information! For
further details on this legislation and reasons that this law must
be amended, read the
talking
points and the
commentary.
The second step
is to ask your state representative to co-sponsor HB 2084
(sponsor: Rep. Phil King). When I asked a legislator recently to
co-sponsor the TPRRA, he told me that a home schooler had spoken
to him about the issue a week before and that he would be glad to
make that commitment. They care what their constituents think!
Call or meet with your
state
representative. Inform him of your support of HB 2084 and
ask him to be a co-sponsor. The more calls they get, the more
seriously they will view the issue and the more likely they will
be to sign on as supporters. Then help THSC find co-sponsors by
emailing about the
feedback you get from your representative.
The third step
is to gather all your friends, neighbors, and family members and
go to the Capitol to the Rally for Parental Rights on April
7. Legislators must know Texas families will not stand for
unwarranted government intrusion. The public must be informed of
the problem and inspired to act.
Carpool!
Need a ride to
Austin? Have an open seat or two in your vehicle? Email
events@thsc.org with your name and the number of seats
needed/available. THSC will work to help everyone who wants to
come find a way there.
Please pray for
THSC Association as we seek to use all the means at our disposal
to stand up for families and fight for parental rights. With
your help and God’s grace, we will restore and protect parental
rights in Texas!
In your service,
Tim Lambert
PS In addition to
working on the TPRRA, we are also endorsing the effort by
ParentalRights.org to amend the U.S. Constitution with language
that would state unequivocally that a parent’s right to direct the
education and upbringing of his/her child is a fundamental right
under the Constitution. This group has a five-year plan to amend
the Constitution as a further protection of parental rights. For
more information on that effort, go to
Parental Rights.org.
Many Families Negatively
Impacted by Grandparent Access Statute
Some years ago
THSC was contacted by a home school mom in West Texas who was
desperate for help in fighting a lawsuit against her family, which
had been filed by her father. The following is her story:
She was married
to her second husband and had one child from the previous marriage
and two by her current husband. The family was of humble means and
had chosen to homeschool because they were concerned about the
negative influences of their children’s peers in the public
school. Her parents, however, did not agree with this decision
and, in fact, believed that the parents were being
“overprotective”; they were especially critical of decisions
related to the oldest child. During one time together with the
family, the grandfather physically attacked the husband in front
of the whole family. As a result, the parents sought and received
a restraining order to prohibit the grandfather from being with
the family.
The grandparents
responded by filing suit under the Grandparent Access
Statute. The grandparents’ lawyer claimed that it was in the
best interest of the children to have visitation with their
grandfather. The children’s emotional well-being, he argued, would
be significantly impaired because they were being homeschooled and
did not have enough interaction with other children. In spite of
the history of assault upon the father, the judged ordered
visitation for both grandparents. The grandparents continued the
legal action against the parents for years, seeking more and more
control of the children. At one point, they told the parents they
would drop the lawsuit if they could have custody of the oldest
child while the parents maintained custody of the younger two.
After many years of litigation, the parents finally yielded and
allowed their oldest child to live with the grandparents.
In a similar
case, a family in Houston had homeschooled for many years, against
the strong dissent of the paternal grandparents. The grandparents
strongly disagreed with many of the views of the parents,
including religious beliefs and educational decisions of the
family, and the father told his parents at one point that if they
continued to interfere and cause discord, they would not be
allowed to visit the children. Then the father suddenly became ill
with cancer and died within six months.
The grandparents
began their attack almost immediately after their son’s death. A
CPS (Child Protective Services) caseworker later testified in
court she was certain the grandparents had been responsible for a
phony tip that the mother had made a death pact to kill herself
and all her children so they could join the soul of the deceased
husband and father. The grandparents filed suit for visitation,
and the mother unwisely took her children and moved out of the
country, without notifying the authorities. The grandparents then
amended their suit from visitation to custody. In the absence of
the family, a judge gave a default judgment of custody to the
grandparents who then spent $200,000 to find the family. Armed
soldiers forcibly removed the children, allowing the mother to
accompany them, only to be arrested when she reentered the
country. The mother was indicted for interfering with child
custody and jailed with bonds set totaling three million dollars.
She spent several months in jail, until the bond was lowered to
$30,000. A court-appointed attorney for the minor children said
she had interviewed each child and was moved by how close they
were to their mother and by their desire to be with her. The
grandparents sought joint custody and wanted to make the
educational decisions for the children. After three and a half
years of litigation, the mother finally regained sole custody of
her children. Unfortunately, not all such cases have this positive
an ending.
These kinds of
stories are not unusual. In fact, recently a widow, whose husband
was killed in the military overseas, was sued by the paternal
grandparents within two weeks of her husband’s death. Hundreds of
families have lived through such nightmares. Others continue. The
Texas Supreme Court has ruled in two such cases—in 2006 and
2007—in the parents’ favor. In both cases, after the Supreme
Court’s ruling, the local judge allowed the grandparents to simply
file suit again. These and many other parents face the stark
choice of bankruptcy or yielding to the unreasonable demands of
grandparents regarding the upbringing and education of their
children.
Read Tim Lambert's update on the parental rights
battle:
|